Statewide base property tax rates might increase again — by a nickel in 2015 — to meet the rising cost of education. But in recommending the rate bump, Tax Commissioner Mary Peterson also suggests looking for a way to get schools to curb spending.
Peterson issued her official property tax recommendation Tuesday afternoon: Base homestead property tax rates should go from 94 cents to 99 cents, she said; non-residential property tax rates should increase from $1.44 to $1.49. Peterson recommended no change to the homestead income tax rate of 1.8 percent.
The Legislature, which ultimately sets statewide tax rates, will consider Peterson’s recommendations when it reconvenes in January.
Lawmakers also might respond to Peterson’s urging that they consider ways to limit the growth of education spending from year to year. Her message echoes one she delivered to the House Ways & Means Committee at a recent pre-session meeting that focused on education finance.
Gov. Peter Shumlin on Tuesday also appealed to school boards to keep their budgets lean.
930 words / VTDigger.org Despite conceding that Vermont will miss his target of statewide broadband and cellular coverage before year’s end, Gov. Shumlin Wednesday gathered top telecommunications executives to celebrate how far they’ve come.
About 3,000 homes still lack high-speed Internet service — representing less than 1 percent of residences in the state. Of those homes without service, solutions have been identified for the vast majority, though connection dates remain elusive. Five or fewer locations still remain without any solutions figured out. Administration Secretary Jeb Spaulding said the effort has been largely successful. “I think (the governor) is excited and thankful and gratified for the progress we have made, and I think for all intents and purposes, we have hit his target.”
State Treasurer Beth Pearce might soon run out of metaphors for the chronic funding shortfall in Vermont’s teacher retirement system.
It’s a “monster,” she told the House Appropriations Committee on Wednesday. “It’s at a tipping point,” she said. It’s like a credit card that charges 18 percent interest, when a 2 percent deal sits idle on your desk. “It’s taking the wind out of the sails of (the pension system’s) recovery.”
The Vermont State Teachers’ Retirement System (VSTRS) encompasses pensions and other retirement benefits of retired teachers. It’s one of three pension systems managed by the state treasurer — the other two being state and municipal employees.
The teacher pensions have been consistently funded by the state Legislature in recent years, Pearce says, but the health care benefits have not. The state is falling about $20 million short each year, she estimates, based on the current cost of healthcare and demand for services. The health care is getting paid for, Pearce emphasizes, but in a very expensive way.
Beverly Grout suspects a neighbor may have told the loggers that she and her husband Fred would be in the market to sell some timber.
She said the loggers, Ken Bacon Jr. and Ken Bacon Sr., knocked on the door of their home on a hill overlooking Barre back in June. Within days, the Grouts signed a contract.
“We didn’t realize who they were,” she said.
Left with 20 acres of damaged forestland and a blocked stream in Barre Town the Grouts wish they had known more about the Bacons’ track record.
The father and son logging team have a long legal history with Vermont environmental and criminal courts. Both men are under order to notify the state of when and where they’ll be cutting, but officials were not informed they were working at the Grout property.
“Unfortunately, they didn’t clean up thoroughly when they left,” Barrett said. Now two stream crossings are blocked, landings and fields that weren’t properly seeded are muddy, and knee-high ruts from machinery further contribute to soil erosion.
Attempts to reach the Bacons were not successful. A woman who declined to give her name, but identified herself as their secretary, said in a phone interview Thursday night that the father-son team from Barton are loggers who want to do the best timber management possible.
After asking the Bacons to leave several times, the Grouts say, they finally called the police in late August to force them off the property.
The Grouts say the Bacons harvested timber they weren’t supposed to, didn’t pay for all the loads they took and improperly dammed a stream with skidder bridges, which they subsequently left in place. The Grouts are left to clean up the mess or pay someone to do it — prospects they hardly can afford.
The Bacons’ secretary says the Grouts had initiated the relationship — not the other way around — but never informed the Bacons that the land was in Current Use. She says the men did nothing that wasn’t agreed to, paid the Grouts for every load, can’t be blamed for not completing a job they were kicked off, and are preparing to sue the Grouts for breach of contract for not being allowed to finish.
The Department of Environmental Conservation has launched an investigation.
As Vermont’s state government takes its first baby step into the giant world of open data, the state’s civic hackers are lining up to help.
Harry Bell of Vermont’s Department of Information and Innovation announced Tuesday that the state would be stepping out of its website shell and into the “open data” movement — a growing international trend toward making government data more available to the public.
In line with principles of “proactive disclosure,” which makes public information freely available before anyone has to ask for it, open data is the product of a systematic methodology that seeks to catalog, structure, unify and publish as much government data as possible.
At an Open Data Consortium in Montpelier Tuesday afternoon, coordinated by the Vermont Center for Geographic Information, Bell described his job as using the Internet to facilitate communication between the state and the rest of the world. To date, that communication has consisted of a hodgepodge system of websites, most cut off from each other by separate back-ends and proprietary formats.
“The rest of the state’s interaction with open data kind of starts with last week on Tuesday,” Bell said.
Todd Bachelder will have to recalibrate his family’s vision for a new future — one closer to Springfield, Mass., than Newport, Vt.
The CEO of Menck Windows said he and his wife were looking forward to moving from Maine to the shores of “beautiful Lake Memphremagog” in the Northeast Kingdom. Bachelder had been working with Jay Peak co-owners Bill Stenger and Ariel Quiros to establish the German window manufacturing company’s North American headquarters in Newport.
Menck still is moving forward to establish itself in North America: but not in Vermont, and not with EB-5 immigrant funding.
The EB-5 Immigrant Investor program, championed in Congress by Sen. Patrick Leahy, provides a two-year conditional visa to would-be immigrants who invest between $500,000 and $1 million in an American business. As long as 10 jobs are created directly or indirectly by that investment within two years — or, as long as 10 jobs’ worth of economic activity can be attributed to the investment — the visa turns into a green card.
Job creation and generally boosting economic activity is the program’s stated goal — and also, in Menck’s case, the hitch.
Vermont legislators agreed in May to offer up to $8.67 million in refunds and discounts to businesses that laid off workers in the wake of 2011′s disastrous floods.
But only 75 employers, among the untold eligible businesses hailing from every county in the state, applied for the unemployment insurance relief. Instead of giving breaks for a “worst-case” scenario of 11,247 layoffs, the state forgave at least partial charges on just 299.
On their July 1 unemployment insurance bills, 54 businesses accepted $264,178.53 in refunds.
“Really, that’s all? Wow,” said Steve Moyer, CFO of Woodstock Farmers’ Market.
The retail business benefited from the program almost two years after temporarily laying off all of its 50 employees.
Like other businesses, the company’s unemployment insurance charges — the money that feeds the trust fund from which unemployment benefits are paid — presumably had gone up because they’re based partly on employers’ history of layoffs: the more layoffs, the bigger the bill.
But on top of other flood-related repairs, the insurance hike hindered their recovery, employers argued. Lawmakers agreed to cut them some slack.
After a partial refund and with a discount on its current unemployment insurance charges, Moyer estimates the market’s costs will increase by $90,000 over the course of three years.
“We got hit very hard with that cost,” he said. Had more relief been offered, he wonders if his business would have taken such a hit.
Moyer’s reaction embodies the conundrum policymakers wrestled with when they struck a deal in May to create the state’s Unemployment Insurance Disaster Relief program. Some legislators were reluctant to give employers any relief, while others wanted to offer more.
When it comes to flood insurance in Vermont, it’s federal reforms that worry Susan Donegan.
The commissioner of the Department of Financial Regulation gives an example: She heard from a Washington County resident a few days ago who faced an $8,000 premium for a year of flood insurance in a high-risk zone. The bill was sticker shock for a property owner who hadn’t resided in a risky zone before the latest flood map for Washington County was adopted in March.
But it’s not just the new designation that drove up the price — and that may drive down the home’s property value. It’s the fact that the bill reflects the property’s actual risk.
Residential flood insurance, for the most part only available from the federal government, is undergoing major changes in 2013 with the rollout of the Biggert-Watters Flood Insurance Reform Act of 2012. The congressional changes were inspired long before Tropical Storm Irene, as was the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s initiative to update the country’s flood insurance rate maps.
“You can debate global warming,” Donegan said, “but you can’t deny that we’re having more severe and more frequent severe storms.” Known as BW-12, the Biggert-Watters Act was crafted to address that reality and shore up federal flood insurance in its wake.
Donegan doesn’t argue the intention, but she’s concerned about what its drastic changes will mean for Vermont property owners.
When North Bennington turned its public school private this year, some people in the Statehouse and Agency of Education grew nervous.
What would this mean for local and state taxpayers, they wondered. For the Education Fund? For children in the district?
A moratorium and an outright ban on the same transition in other towns were floated in both the House and Senate, but ultimately lawmakers settled on a committee to study the issue further. That group met for the second time Wednesday morning. It’s off to a slow — but passionate — start.
Central to the sometimes edgy debate was all manner of access: Access to a full range of services for students with special needs, access to school choice for families and access to school records and accountability mechanisms for state officials and members of the public.
In a bid to shore up the controversial EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program, Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has proposed a roster of improvements: stronger oversight, better reporting and streamlined reviews of business plans and visa applications, among them.
His revisions also would tweak the job creation requirement to define full-time employment not as someone working at least 35 hours per week, but by the equivalent of a full-time job, “regardless of how many employees fill the position.”
The changes would be written into a new statute that codifies and makes permanent what is now a pilot program. So-called regional centers help private businesses pool investments from would-be immigrants, at either $1 million or $500,000 apiece, depending on the regional center’s location.